St Mark logo

Serving Christ & the world through liturgy, mission & community.

Meeting Sundays 11 a.m.
1301 Franklin Rd, Brentwood, TN
Phone: (615) 438-3109

YouTube logo

Contending for the Faith

4369In his insightful work, Contending for the Faith, Ralph Wood writes, “H. Richard Niebuhr once said that it is much easier to declare what we oppose than what we propose, and yet that the latter is the far more important task.  It’s easy enough to condemn and point out faults, but another thing entirely to remedy and to edify.  Niebuhr was making a Christian no less than a common-sense claim.  The Gospel is not fundamentally a word of negation, not even the negation of our own cultural sickness unto death.  The Gospel is God’s vehement No to the No of humanity’s sinfulness, and thus God’s great glad Yes to his whole creation” (105).

As one who is both Reformed and Presbyterian, I find this to be an accurate critique of the very air which Reformed Presbyterians all too readily imbibe and then live out with inebriated fervor.  We are so quick to critique, so ready to condemn the faults and errors of others as the self-appointed guardians of the Bible, that we end up neglecting the very Gospel we claim to defend.  The truth which is to be adorned becomes smothered under a heavy blanket of censoriousness.

As one who has regretfully evidenced and experienced such a spirit, Niebuhr’s observation provides the remedy.  As Reformed Presbyterian Christians, it is vitally important for us to be declaring who and what we are for, instead of so eagerly decrying those we believe to be in the wrong.  Certainly there is a time and place for declaring error to be error, but what happens when that is your default disposition?  You end up with curmudgeonly Christians who cannot see the wider world which God has made and redeemed.

Perhaps part of the problem that Reformed Presbys have is an inevitable result of the Reformation.  After all, the likes of Martin Luther, John Calvin and John Knox were embroiled in a fight against ecclesiastical entities, and therefore had to declare wherein they disagreed with their opposition.  That is our history.  Furthermore, as those who have largely dieted upon Paul’s polemical epistles, is it any wonder, then, that we engage the argument with such ease?  Not if we are honest.

Therefore, let us be giving ourselves all the more to the suppression of our critical spirit, and the cultivation of a humble one.  Let us be about declaring Christ our King, and serving in the glorious new kingdom that has been inaugurated.  For as we do so, I suspect we will be too busy being part of the solution to be delineating the shortcomings of others.

The Church’s Mission from the Empty Tomb

2200“The answer to the challenge of postmodernism is not to run back tearfully into the arms of modernism.  It is to hear in postmodernity God’s judgment on the follies and failings, the sheer selfish arrogance, of modernity and to look and pray and work for the resurrection into God’s new world out beyond.  We live at a great cultural turning point; Christian mission in the postmodern world must be the means of the church grasping the initiative and enabling our world to turn the corner in the right direction.

We must therefore get used to a mission that includes living the true Christian praxis.  Christian praxis consists in the love of God in Christ being poured out in us and through us.  If this is truly happening, it is not damaged by postmodern critique, the hermeneutic of suspicion.  We must get used to telling the story of God, Israel, Jesus and the world as the true metanarrative, the story of healing and self-giving love.  We must get used to living as those who have truly died and risen with Christ so that our self, having been thoroughly deconstructed, can be put back together, not by the agendas that the world presses upon us but by God’s Spirit.” – N.T. Wright, The Challenge of Jesus

New Blog

http://stmarkreformed.org/category/pastors-page/

The Church-Friendly Family

Color logo with name

Recently I have been listening to the lectures delivered by Randy Booth and Rich Lusk at last year’s Family Advance in Sandestin, FL, and cannot recommend them highly enough.  They are excellent, and are well worth your consumption sooner than later.  I would hope that all the families at St. Mark would take some time in the coming months to listen to them, as they so thoroughly define the identity and principles we are striving for as a congregation.